🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."